Skip to content

A Twin capability

Relevant clinical-trial opportunities, for review.

Clinical-trial intelligence is part of OnKommon Twin — not a separate product. TrialGraph (layer 16) identifies trials that may be relevant to the case and explains why, for the treating team to review.

From match to enrolment

A potential match is the first of five steps

Each step is distinct. Twin supports the first; people decide the rest.
  1. 01

    Potential match

    The case's diagnosis, biomarkers, prior treatment and location appear compatible with some published criteria.

    TrialGraph · for review

  2. 02

    Clinician review

    The treating oncologist considers whether the trial is appropriate to discuss with the patient.

    Treating oncologist

  3. 03

    Screening

    The trial team assesses full eligibility criteria, which often go beyond what is in registries.

    Trial team

  4. 04

    Confirmed eligibility

    Only the trial team can confirm that a patient meets the criteria.

    Trial team

  5. 05

    Enrolment

    Depends on consent, slot availability and sponsor acceptance.

    Patient · trial team · sponsor

How matching works

Comparing the case with published criteria

Trial matching compares structured features of the case — disease, biomarkers, prior treatment and location — with eligibility criteria published in trial registries. Each potential match comes with the rationale: which criteria appear to be met, which are unknown, and which need checking.

Registry information can be incomplete or out of date, and recruitment status changes. Potential matches appear in the fourth component of the Twin report, alongside treatment options to evaluate.

Boundaries

The treating oncologist owns every decision. Every Twin report is reviewed and signed by the treating oncologist, then taken to KPCIRC's Molecular Tumour Board.

KPCIRC sign-off process

See trial intelligence in a Twin demonstration.

Continue the journey

The 21 analytical layers

Step inside every layer.

→