Skip to content
Skip this journey

Layer 8 of 21 · Tumour behaviour

ResistMap Resistance mechanisms and bypass routes.

Tumours can become less sensitive to a treatment through changes in the drug's target or by switching to alternative signalling routes (bypass pathways). ResistMap is intended to surface findings the evidence associates with resistance, so they can be considered in context.

Why it's needed

What resistance-related mechanisms or alternate pathways may warrant consideration?

Resistance-associated findings with the strength and type of supporting evidence shown.

What it draws on

3 of 8 evidence domains.

Molecular & genomicTreatment exposureEvidence ecosystemMolecular findings, prior and current therapies, and the resistance literature.

What it produces

Resistance-related signals or hypotheses, and supporting context for clinician review.

Present supported resistance-associated findings and the evidence connecting them to the tumour context.

Why it's essential

Layer 8 of 21.

Read alongside AccessMatch in the treatment-options section, and revisited when treatment changes or new findings arrive.

1 · What it does

What ResistMap does

Tumours can become less sensitive to a treatment through changes in the drug's target or by switching to alternative signalling routes (bypass pathways). ResistMap is intended to surface findings the evidence associates with resistance, so they can be considered in context.

2 · Scientific question

The question it addresses

What resistance-related mechanisms or alternate pathways may warrant consideration?

Intended function

Present supported resistance-associated findings and the evidence connecting them to the tumour context.

3 · Data inputs and required context

What it draws on

  • 01 Molecular & genomic
  • 06 Treatment exposure
  • 08 Evidence ecosystem

Molecular findings, prior and current therapies, and the resistance literature.

4 · Scientific basis

The science behind it

Scientific basis

Resistance-associated evidence includes secondary alterations in the drug target, activation of parallel pathways and changes in cell lineage. The supporting evidence ranges from clinical cohorts to laboratory models, and its strength varies widely.

5 · Output and evidence sources

What it produces

Main output

Resistance-related signals or hypotheses, and supporting context for clinician review.

Output type

  • Evidence-linked interpretation. Connects a finding to published or curated evidence, which has a source and a date.
  • Computational inference. Estimated by analysis of available data rather than measured directly.

6 · Why it\u2019s essential

How it powers the Twin

Read alongside AccessMatch in the treatment-options section, and revisited when treatment changes or new findings arrive.

Capability

Explore

Review treatment-relevant evidence, resistance-related findings and potential trial matches.

7 · Why it\u2019s needed

What it changes — for doctors, patients and researchers

Clinicians

Resistance-associated findings with the strength and type of supporting evidence shown.

Doctor & Clinical Team

Patients & caregivers

Explains why a treatment that once worked may be reconsidered, and why new tests may be discussed.

Patient & Caregiver

Researchers

Candidate resistance mechanisms for investigation.

Industry & Research

8 · Dependencies and limitations

Limitations

  • A plausible mechanism is not proof that resistance is present, or that a specific treatment will fail.
  • Laboratory evidence of resistance may not translate to patients.

9 · Review and uncertainty

How the output is handled

Output status

An AI-assisted analytical output presented as structured findings for clinician review. It becomes part of a report only after the treating oncologist has reviewed and signed it.

How uncertainty is communicated

Each signal is tagged with its evidence type (clinical, preclinical or inferred) and how directly it applies to the case.

10 · Claim boundary

What this layer does not establish

It does not establish that the tumour is resistant to a given therapy.

The treating oncologist owns every decision. Every Twin report is reviewed and signed by the treating oncologist, then taken to KPCIRC's Molecular Tumour Board.

KPCIRC sign-off process

Continue the journey

Longitudinal monitoring

Every change goes in.

→